September 6, 2013 in Region
Katherine Long Seattle Times
SEATTLE ? A federal appeals-court ruling has found that a Washington State University professor who circulated a controversial proposal to revamp the school?s communications department was protected by the First?Amendment.
A lawyer for the American Association of University Professors, which supported the former WSU professor in a brief, called it ?a significant ruling protecting the academic freedom of professors at public?institutions.?
Aaron Nisenson, senior counsel for AAUP, said the degree of free-speech protection afforded to university professors was thrown in doubt by a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Garcetti v. Ceballos, which restricted the free speech of??
You have viewed 20 free articles or blogs allowed within a 30-day period. FREE registration is now required for uninterrupted access.
Registration Required
- log in to your Spokesman.com account for unlimited viewing and commenting access.
- Don't have a Spokesman.com account? Create a Spokesman.com profile and register for FREE access.
-
S-R Media, The Spokesman-Review and Spokesman.com are happy to assist you. Contact Customer Service by email or call 800-338-8801
SEATTLE ? A federal appeals-court ruling has found that a Washington State University professor who circulated a controversial proposal to revamp the school?s communications department was protected by the First?Amendment.
A lawyer for the American Association of University Professors, which supported the former WSU professor in a brief, called it ?a significant ruling protecting the academic freedom of professors at public?institutions.?
Aaron Nisenson, senior counsel for AAUP, said the degree of free-speech protection afforded to university professors was thrown in doubt by a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Garcetti v. Ceballos, which restricted the free speech of public?employees.
?The question in the courts has been, ?When is speech considered academic speech, that is protected???? Nisenson said. ?This was a significant case in that it further clarified when that speech is?protected.?
The case involves David Demers, a former WSU communications professor, who distributed a two-page pamphlet in 2007 that outlined a plan to improve WSU?s Edward R. Murrow School of Communication. At the time, the future of the school was being?debated.
Later, Demers ? who now teaches at Arizona State University ? sued WSU in U.S. District Court, claiming administrators retaliated against him, in part by giving him negative performance?reviews.
The district court said that Demers? writings were distributed as part of his official duties and therefore were not protected under the First Amendment. That decision drew on the 2006 Supreme Court ruling which held that public employees acting or speaking in their official capacity were not protected by the First Amendment, Nisenson?said.
Demers appealed to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which reversed some parts of the ruling?Wednesday.
Demers said in an email that professors should have the freedom to criticize administrators and their policies and said the decision ?bolsters the idea that free-speech protection for professors extends beyond their academic research programs and the?classroom.?
WSU spokeswoman Kathy Barnard said by email that the ruling ?speaks for itself. It is worth noting that the court did not in any way find that WSU or its officials/employees engaged in any?wrongdoing.?
The judges found insufficient evidence to show retaliation. But they ruled that Deming?s pamphlet was protected speech because it addressed a matter of public?concern.
Source: http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2013/sep/06/ex-washington-state-professors-writing-ruled/
veep los angeles kings timothy leary jonathan frid pujols watchmen hitch
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন